Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 02/12/2018 04:28 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious >>> reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h >>> from slab.h and add <linux/kmemleak.h> to any users of kmemleak_* >>> that don't already #include it. >>> Also remove <linux/kmemleak.h> from source files that do not use it. >>> >>> This is tested on i386 allmodconfig and x86_64 allmodconfig. It >>> would be good to run it through the 0day bot for other $ARCHes. >>> I have neither the horsepower nor the storage space for the other >>> $ARCHes. >>> >>> [slab.h is the second most used header file after module.h; kernel.h >>> is right there with slab.h. There could be some minor error in the >>> counting due to some #includes having comments after them and I >>> didn't combine all of those.] >>> >>> This is Lingchi patch #1 (death by a thousand cuts, applied to kernel >>> header files). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I threw it at a random selection of configs and so far the only failures >> I'm seeing are: >> >> lib/test_firmware.c:134:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> lib/test_firmware.c:620:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> lib/test_firmware.c:620:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> security/integrity/digsig.c:146:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > Both of those source files need to #include <linux/vmalloc.h>. Yep, I added those and rebuilt. I don't see any more failures that look related to your patch. http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/13399/ I haven't gone through the defconfigs I have enabled for a while, so it's possible I have some missing but it's still a reasonable cross section. cheers _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization