On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:27:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to call mutex_lock() in vhost_dev_lock_vqs() which tries to
> hold mutexes of all virtqueues. This may confuse lockdep to report a
> possible deadlock because of trying to hold locks belong to same
> class. Switch to use mutex_lock_nested() to avoid false positive.
>
> Fixes: 6b1e6cc7855b0 ("vhost: new device IOTLB API")
> Reported-by: syzbot+dbb7c1161485e61b0241@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 33ac2b1..549771a 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static void vhost_dev_lock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
> {
> int i = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < d->nvqs; ++i)
> - mutex_lock(&d->vqs[i]->mutex);
> + mutex_lock_nested(&d->vqs[i]->mutex, i);
> }
>
> static void vhost_dev_unlock_vqs(struct vhost_dev *d)
> --
> 2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
