On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:41:39 -0800
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 7:47 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I'll need to look at this more, in particular the feature
> > bit is missing here. For now one question:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 04:40:36PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> >> @@ -56,6 +58,8 @@ module_param(napi_tx, bool, 0644);
> >> */
> >> DECLARE_EWMA(pkt_len, 0, 64)
> >>
> >> +#define VF_TAKEOVER_INT (HZ / 10)
> >> +
> >> #define VIRTNET_DRIVER_VERSION "1.0.0"
> >>
> >> static const unsigned long guest_offloads[] = {
> > Why is this delay necessary? And why by 100ms?
>
> This is based on netvsc implementation and here is the commit that
> added this delay. Not sure if this needs to be 100ms.
>
> commit 6123c66854c174e4982f98195100c1d990f9e5e6
> Author: stephen hemminger <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed Aug 9 17:46:03 2017 -0700
>
> netvsc: delay setup of VF device
>
> When VF device is discovered, delay bring it automatically up in
> order to allow userspace to some simple changes (like renaming).
>
>
>
could be 10ms, just enough to let udev do its renaming
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
