On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:27:24PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > On 11/16/2017 04:32 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 04:13:06PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > > Negotiation of the VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_VQ feature indicates the > > > support of reporting hints of guest free pages to the host via > > > virtio-balloon. The host requests the guest to report the free pages by > > > sending commands via the virtio-balloon configuration registers. > > > > > > When the guest starts to report, the first element added to the free page > > > vq is a sequence id of the start reporting command. The id is given by > > > the host, and it indicates whether the following free pages correspond > > > to the command. For example, the host may stop the report and start again > > > with a new command id. The obsolete pages for the previous start command > > > can be detected by the id dismatching on the host. The id is added to the > > > vq using an output buffer, and the free pages are added to the vq using > > > input buffer. > > > > > > Here are some explainations about the added configuration registers: > > > - host2guest_cmd: a register used by the host to send commands to the > > > guest. > > > - guest2host_cmd: written by the guest to ACK to the host about the > > > commands that have been received. The host will clear the corresponding > > > bits on the host2guest_cmd register. The guest also uses this register > > > to send commands to the host (e.g. when finish free page reporting). > > > - free_page_cmd_id: the sequence id of the free page report command > > > given by the host. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Liang Li <liang.z.li@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > + > > > +static void report_free_page(struct work_struct *work) > > > +{ > > > + struct virtio_balloon *vb; > > > + > > > + vb = container_of(work, struct virtio_balloon, report_free_page_work); > > > + report_free_page_cmd_id(vb); > > > + walk_free_mem_block(vb, 0, &virtio_balloon_send_free_pages); > > > + /* > > > + * The last few free page blocks that were added may not reach the > > > + * batch size, but need a kick to notify the device to handle them. > > > + */ > > > + virtqueue_kick(vb->free_page_vq); > > > + report_free_page_end(vb); > > > +} > > > + > > I think there's an issue here: if pages are poisoned and hypervisor > > subsequently drops them, testing them after allocation will > > trigger a false positive. > > > > The specific configuration: > > > > PAGE_POISONING on > > PAGE_POISONING_NO_SANITY off > > PAGE_POISONING_ZERO off > > > > > > Solutions: > > 1. disable the feature in that configuration > > suggested as an initial step > > Thanks for the finding. > Similar to this option: I'm thinking could we make walk_free_mem_block() > simply return if that option is on? > That is, at the beginning of the function: > if (!page_poisoning_enabled()) > return; > > I think in most usages, people would not choose to use the poisoning option > due to the added overhead. > > > Probably we could make it a separate fix patch of this report following > patch 5 to explain the above reasons in the commit. > > > 2. pass poison value to host so it can validate page content > > before it drops it > > 3. pass poison value to host so it can init allocated pages with that value > > > > In fact one nice side effect would be that unmap > > becomes safe even though free list is not locked anymore. > > I haven't got this point yet, how would it bring performance benefit? Upon getting a free page, host could check that its content matches the poison value. If it doesn't page has been used. But let's ignore this for now. > > It would be interesting to see whether this last has > > any value performance-wise. > > > > Best, > Wei _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization