Re: packed ring layout proposal v3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 02:34:56PM +0000, Ilya Lesokhin wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 4:22 PM
> > To: Ilya Lesokhin <ilyal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: virtio-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: packed ring layout proposal v3
> > 
> > If you do this whats the point of the id? Just use descriptor offset like virtio 0 did.
> > 
> 
> I agree that ID is pointless when requests are completed in order.
> 
> But I'm not sure what you mean by descriptor offset?

Where the descriptor is within the ring.

-- 
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux