Re: [Qemu-devel] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in free_old_xmit_skbs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/27/2017 04:13 AM, Jason Wang wrote:


On 2017年06月26日 15:35, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote:
On 06/26/2017 04:50 AM, Jason Wang wrote:


On 2017年06月24日 06:32, Cong Wang wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2017年06月23日 02:53, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 08:15:58AM +0200, jean-philippe menil wrote:
Hi Michael,

from what i see, the race appear when we hit virtnet_reset in
virtnet_xdp_set.
virtnet_reset
    _remove_vq_common
      virtnet_del_vqs
        virtnet_free_queues
          kfree(vi->sq)
when the xdp program (with two instances of the program to trigger it
faster)
is added or removed.

It's easily repeatable, with 2 cpus and 4 queues on the qemu command
line,
running the xdp_ttl tool from Jesper.

For now, i'm able to continue my qualification, testing if xdp_qp is not
null,
but do not seem to be a sustainable trick.
if (xdp_qp && vi->xdp_queues_pairs != xdp_qp)

Maybe it will be more clear to you with theses informations.

Best regards.

Jean-Philippe

I'm pretty clear about the issue here, I was trying to figure out a fix.
Jason, any thoughts?


Hi Jean:

Does the following fix this issue? (I can't reproduce it locally through
xdp_ttl)
It is tricky here.

 From my understanding of the code base, the tx_lock is not sufficient
here, because in virtnet_del_vqs() all vqs are deleted and one vp
maps to one txq.

I am afraid you have to add a spinlock somewhere to serialized
free_old_xmit_skbs() vs. vring_del_virtqueue(). As you can see
they are in different layers, so it is hard to figure out where to add
it...

Also, make sure we don't sleep inside the spinlock, I see a
synchronize_net().

Looks like I miss something. I thought free_old_xmit_skbs() were serialized in this case since we disable all tx queues after netif_tx_unlock_bh()?

Jean:

I thought this could be easily reproduced by e.g produce some traffic and in the same time try to attach an xdp program. But looks not. How do you trigger this? What's your qemu command line for this?

Thanks

Hi Jason,

this is how i trigger the bug:
- on the guest, tcpdump on on the interface
- on the guest, run iperf against the host
- on the guest, cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe
- on the guest, run one or two instances of xdp_ttl compiled with DEBUG uncommented, that i start stop, until i trigger the bug.

qemu command line is as follow:

qemu-system-x86_64 -name ubuntu --enable-kvm -machine pc,accel=kvm -smp 2 -drive file=/dev/LocalDisk/ubuntu,if=virtio,format=raw -m 2048 -rtc base=localtime,clock=host -usbdevice tablet --balloon virtio -netdev tap,id=ubuntu-0,ifname=ubuntu-0,script=/home/jenfi/WORK/jp/qemu/if-up,downscript=/home/jenfi/WORK/jp/qemu/if-down,vhost=on,queues=4 -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=ubuntu-0,mac=de:ad:be:ef:01:03,mq=on,guest_tso4=off,guest_tso6=off,guest_ecn=off,guest_ufo=off,vectors=2 -vnc 127.0.0.1:3 -nographic -serial file:/home/jenfi/WORK/jp/qemu/ubuntu.out -monitor unix:/home/jenfi/WORK/jp/qemu/ubuntu.sock,server,nowait

Notice, the smp 2, queues to 4 and vectors to 2.
Seem that if fogot to mention that in the beginning of this thread, sorry for that.

Best regards.

Jean-Philippe


Thanks Jean, I manage to reproduce the issue.

I thought netif_tx_unlock_bh() will do tx lock but looks not, that's why previous patch doesn't work.

Could you please this this patch? (At least it can't trigger the warning after more than 20 times of xdp start/stop).

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 1f8c15c..a18f859 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1802,6 +1802,7 @@ static void virtnet_freeze_down(struct virtio_device *vdev)
         flush_work(&vi->config_work);

         netif_device_detach(vi->dev);
+       netif_tx_disable(vi->dev);
         cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);

         if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {



Hi Jason,

Seem to do the trick !
with your patch, i'm unable to repeat the problem anymore (running more than 2h without any issue).

Best regards.

Jean-Philippe
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux