On 10/17/2017 04:17 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:36:57AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 10/17/2017 10:36 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: >>> Maybe we can add a new field to the alternatives entry struct which >>> specifies the offset to the CALL instruction, so apply_alternatives() >>> can find it. >> We'd also have to assume that the restore part of an alternative entry >> is the same size as the save part. Which is true now. > Why? > Don't you need to know the size of the instruction without save and restore part? + if (a->replacementlen == 6 && *insnbuf == 0xff && *(insnbuf+1) == 0x15) Otherwise you'd need another field for the actual instruction length. -boris _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
