>
> On 08/03/2017 04:13 PM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >>
> >> + /* Allocate space for find_vqs parameters */
> >> + vqs = kcalloc(nvqs, sizeof(*vqs), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!vqs)
> >> + goto err_vq;
> >> + callbacks = kmalloc_array(nvqs, sizeof(*callbacks), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!callbacks)
> >> + goto err_callback;
> >> + names = kmalloc_array(nvqs, sizeof(*names), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > is size here (integer) intentional?
>
>
> Sorry, I didn't get it. Could you please elaborate more?
This is okay
>
>
> >
> >> + if (!names)
> >> + goto err_names;
> >> +
> >> + callbacks[0] = balloon_ack;
> >> + names[0] = "inflate";
> >> + callbacks[1] = balloon_ack;
> >> + names[1] = "deflate";
> >> +
> >> + i = 2;
> >> + if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_STATS_VQ)) {
> >> + callbacks[i] = stats_request;
> > just thinking if memory for callbacks[3] & names[3] is allocated?
>
>
> Yes, the above kmalloc_array allocated them.
I mean we have created callbacks array for two entries 0,1?
callbacks = kmalloc_array(nvqs, sizeof(*callbacks), GFP_KERNEL);
But we are trying to access location '2' which is third:
i = 2;
+ if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_STATS_VQ)) {
+ callbacks[i] = stats_request; <---- callbacks[2]
+ names[i] = "stats"; <----- names[2]
+ i++;
+ }
I am missing anything obvious here?
>
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
