On 16-12-23 06:37 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> Commit f600b6905015 ("virtio_net: Add XDP support") leaves the case of
> small receive buffer untouched. This will confuse the user who want to
> set XDP but use small buffers. Other than forbid XDP in small buffer
> mode, let's make it work. XDP then can only work at skb->data since
> virtio-net create skbs during refill, this is sub optimal which could
> be optimized in the future.
>
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
Hi Jason,
I was doing some more testing on this what do you think about doing this
so that free_unused_bufs() handles the buffer free with dev_kfree_skb()
instead of put_page in small receive mode. Seems more correct to me.
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 783e842..27ff76c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1898,6 +1898,10 @@ static void free_receive_page_frags(struct virtnet_info *vi)
static bool is_xdp_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q)
{
+ /* For small receive mode always use kfree_skb variants */
+ if (!vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
+ return false;
+
if (q < (vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs))
return false;
else if (q < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
patch is untested just spotted doing code review.
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
