On 18/11/2016 05:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:32:06PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> Btw I prefer using the kvmtool for my kernel work since it's much more >> simpler.. > > Up to you but then you should extend that to support 1.0 spec. > I strongly object to adding to the list of legacy interfaces > we need to maintain. I object to adding paravirtualization unless there is a good reason why the usual mechanisms for physical machines cannot be used. The cost of maintaining a spec, two device implementations (kvmtool+qemu) and a driver is not small, plus it will not work on older kernels. Paolo _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
