Re: [PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax_yield definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 16.11.2016 um 13:23 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
No need to duplicate the same define everywhere. Since
the only user is stop-machine and the only provider is
s390, we can use a default implementation of cpu_relax_yield
in sched.h.

Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me!

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

David
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux