Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/vmware: Add basic paravirt ops support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Tim Mann wrote:

> I believe our trademark guidelines say we aren't supposed to use VMware as a
> noun to mean a product, only to mean the company.  So we can say "running on
> VMware ESXi" or "running in a VMware virtual machine", but "running on VMware"
> is wrong.  There is supposedly some good legal reason for this related to
> keeping our trademark.

Please sort that out internally and resend the whole lot when this is
resolved.

Thanks,

	tglx
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux