Aaron Conole <aconole@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> The virtio committee recently ratified a change, VIRTIO-152, which >> defines the mtu field to be 'max' MTU, not simply desired MTU. >> >> This commit brings the virtio-net device in compliance with VIRTIO-152. >> >> Additionally, drop the max_mtu branch - it cannot be taken since the u16 >> returned by virtio_cread16 will never exceed the initial value of >> max_mtu. >> >> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > Sorry about the subject line, David. This is targetted at net-next, and > it appears my from was mangled. Would you like me to resubmit with > these details corrected? I answered my own question. Sorry for the noise. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
