Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> FWIW, he already gained a place on my ignore list for pestering me
>> offline about his patches and not stopping even when told to do so.
>
> How did I "pester" you "offline"?
>
>
>> So while I won't object if you choose to apply selected patches,
>
> Another bit of interesting information, isn't it?
>
>
>> I won't comment on any and won't take any (hey, I even won't see
>> them unless someone else replies...)
>
> I find this reaction strange. - I hope that our collaboration potential
> can be still constructive, can't it?

I can understand why others are fed up with this discussion.  Your
communication style is exhausting and you've pushed into the territory
where any benefits of taking the patches are not worth the time and
hassle of dealing with you.

I left Reviewed-bys on two patches.  Maybe they will get picked up.
But please think again about what Christian explained.  Reviewers and
maintainers spend time on your patches so make it worth their while.

Stefan
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux