Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





在 2016/9/29 18:10, Peter Zijlstra 写道:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:45:10AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
change from v2:
	no code change, fix typos, update some comments

change from v1:
	a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted
	skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro.
	add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner.
	add more comments
	thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion.

This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues.

So I really like the concept, but I would also really like to see
support for more hypervisors included before we can move forward with
this.

Please consider s390 and (x86/arm) KVM. Once we have a few, more can
follow later, but I think its important to not only have PPC support for
this.

hi, Peter
	right, we need consider more arches.
I will try to work out a RFC patch on x86 anyway. There are already some discussions of the solution on x86 :)

thanks
xinhui

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux