On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:37:40PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:06:16AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > I hate to send a ping, > > > > Sorry about that. > > > > > but do you think we can merge this fdma series? It has gone > > > through quite a few review rounds now. > > > > > > > I think the remoteproc part looks good. > > yeah I was waiting for ack on other patches. But looks like at least > remoteproc ones have it > > > > Vinod, I don't have any changes queued in remoteproc that should cause > > merge issues. If you want to you could take the remoteproc patch > > through your tree. > > I rechecked the dma part, they look good to me, so I should be able to apply > these. I will wait a day for ack/nacks. It is the time to speak up :) And I have applied thru 9th patch. Others are applied by Patrice. Btw you should send drm ones to drm folks separately and not in this series.. Thanks -- ~Vinod _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
