Hi Bjorn, On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue 30 Aug 05:34 PDT 2016, Lee Jones wrote: > > Thanks for your review Lee. > > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Peter Griffin wrote: > [..] > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > > > index 1a8bf76a..06765e0 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > > > @@ -100,4 +100,12 @@ config ST_REMOTEPROC > > > processor framework. > > > This can be either built-in or a loadable module. > > > > > > +config ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC > > > + tristate "ST Slim remoteproc support" > > > + select REMOTEPROC > > > + help > > > + Say y here to support firmware loading on IP based around > > > + the Slim core. > > > + If unsure say N. > > Saw one more thing when browsing through... > > As this piece of code doesn't do anything on its own and is going to be > selected by the "function driver" I don't think this should be > user-selectable. Applogies, I believe you pointed this out in a previous review, but it seems to have slipped through the net. Will fix in the next version. Regards, Peter. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
