On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:50:06PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 05:53:02PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > The point is really naming label for the part of init that failed > > (and so needs to be skipped), rather than the part that will run. > > Naming labels after what "needs to be skipped" doesn't work. How does > that meaning make sense for err_cgroup in vhost_dev_set_owner()? What > needs to be skipped here? > > regards, > dan carpenter Nothing because we are destroying the thread, so we don't need to detach it. I guess I'm convinced it's not very consistent at this point. -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
