On 07/18/16 at 06:25P, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:18:32 +0800
> Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 07/18/16 at 05:21P, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:01:29 +0800
> > > Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > > index 42758b5..d920512 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> > > > @@ -381,9 +381,9 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
> > > > {
> > > > int err = 0;
> > > > int i;
> > > > - vq_callback_t **callbacks;
> > > > - const char **names;
> > > > - struct virtqueue **vqs;
> > > > + vq_callback_t **callbacks = NULL;
> > > > + const char **names = NULL;
> > > > + struct virtqueue **vqs = NULL;
> > >
> > > If you init the variables to NULL anyway...
> >
> > Hi, Cornelia.
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing this patch.
> >
> > Seems there is no need to init these variables to NULL. I will remove
> > them laster.
>
> Fine with me.
>
> >
> > >
> > > > unsigned short num_vqs;
> > > > struct virtio_device *vdev = vblk->vdev;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -394,22 +394,16 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
> > > > num_vqs = 1;
> > > >
> > >
> > > ...just do
> > >
> > > err = -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > here and...
> > >
> > > > vblk->vqs = kmalloc(sizeof(*vblk->vqs) * num_vqs, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > - if (!vblk->vqs) {
> > > > - err = -ENOMEM;
> > > > - goto out;
> > > > - }
> > > > + if (!vblk->vqs)
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > >
> > > > names = kmalloc(sizeof(*names) * num_vqs, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > - if (!names)
> > > > - goto err_names;
> > > > -
> > > > callbacks = kmalloc(sizeof(*callbacks) * num_vqs, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > - if (!callbacks)
> > > > - goto err_callbacks;
> > > > -
> > > > vqs = kmalloc(sizeof(*vqs) * num_vqs, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > - if (!vqs)
> > > > - goto err_vqs;
> > > > + if (!names || !callbacks || !vqs) {
> > > > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > ...you could use the
> > >
> > > foo = kmalloc(...);
> > > if (!foo)
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > sequence in any case. This avoids trying again and again if e.g. the
> > > names allocation already failed.
> >
> > For this implementation, I have referred others which calls
> > vdev->config->find_vqs as well. Yes, this continues trying to allocate
> > memory, although memory allocation failed before.
>
> It might not be the best idea, though; although it should hopefully be
> a not-so-common occurrence.
Yep, for that memont, there is enough memory to be allocated.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Alternatively, you should be fine if you don't init the variables to
> > > NULL: The code is now either taking an early exit or setting all of the
> > > variables anyway.
> > >
> >
> > It's a big change if we refactor the helper ->find_vqs, since other
> > devices also call it.
>
> Actually, I was referring to not initializing the variables to NULL in
> this function and keeping the rest of your changes: IOW, just what you
> suggested above :)
Ok. I will repost an update to fix it.
Thanks
Minfei
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
