On 2016年07月08日 14:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 01:45:58PM -0400, Craig Gallek wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Jason Wang<jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Hi all:
> >
> >This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to
> >eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The
> >conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use
> >it instead of sk_receive_queue.
>
>I'm seeing the splat below after this series. I'm still wrapping my
>head around this code, but it appears to be happening because the
>tun_struct passed into tun_queue_resize is uninitialized.
>Specifically, iteration over the disabled list_head fails because prev
>= next = NULL. This seems to happen when a startup script on my test
>machine changes the queue length. I'll try to figure out what's
>happening, but if it's obvious to someone else from the stack, please
>let me know.
Don't see anything obvious. I'm traveling, will look at it when I'm back
unless it's fixed by then. Jason, any idea?
Looks like Craig has posted a fix to this:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/645645/
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
