On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:48:27AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hi, > > On (06/16/16 08:12), Minchan Kim wrote: > > > [ 315.146533] kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled > > > [ 315.146538] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access > > > [ 315.146546] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN > > > [ 315.146576] Modules linked in: lzo zram zsmalloc mousedev coretemp hwmon crc32c_intel r8169 i2c_i801 mii snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hda_core acpi_cpufreq snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore lpc_ich mfd_core processor sch_fq_codel sd_mod hid_generic usbhid hid ahci libahci libata ehci_pci ehci_hcd scsi_mod usbcore usb_common > > > [ 315.146785] CPU: 3 PID: 38 Comm: khugepaged Not tainted 4.7.0-rc3-next-20160614-dbg-00004-ga1c2cbc-dirty #488 > > > [ 315.146841] task: ffff8800bfaf2900 ti: ffff880112468000 task.ti: ffff880112468000 > > > [ 315.146859] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa02c413d>] [<ffffffffa02c413d>] zs_page_migrate+0x355/0xaa0 [zsmalloc] > > > > Thanks for the report! > > > > zs_page_migrate+0x355? Could you tell me what line is it? > > > > It seems to be related to obj_to_head. > > reproduced. a bit different call stack this time. but the problem is > still the same. > > zs_compact() > ... > 6371: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 6376 <zs_compact+0x22b> > 6376: 0f 0b ud2 > 6378: 48 8b 95 a8 fe ff ff mov -0x158(%rbp),%rdx > 637f: 4d 8d 74 24 78 lea 0x78(%r12),%r14 > 6384: 4c 89 ee mov %r13,%rsi > 6387: 4c 89 e7 mov %r12,%rdi > 638a: e8 86 c7 ff ff callq 2b15 <get_first_obj_offset> > 638f: 41 89 c5 mov %eax,%r13d > 6392: 4c 89 f0 mov %r14,%rax > 6395: 48 c1 e8 03 shr $0x3,%rax > 6399: 8a 04 18 mov (%rax,%rbx,1),%al > 639c: 84 c0 test %al,%al > 639e: 0f 85 f2 02 00 00 jne 6696 <zs_compact+0x54b> > 63a4: 41 8b 44 24 78 mov 0x78(%r12),%eax > 63a9: 41 0f af c7 imul %r15d,%eax > 63ad: 41 01 c5 add %eax,%r13d > 63b0: 4c 89 f0 mov %r14,%rax > 63b3: 48 c1 e8 03 shr $0x3,%rax > 63b7: 48 01 d8 add %rbx,%rax > 63ba: 48 89 85 88 fe ff ff mov %rax,-0x178(%rbp) > 63c1: 41 81 fd ff 0f 00 00 cmp $0xfff,%r13d > 63c8: 0f 87 1a 03 00 00 ja 66e8 <zs_compact+0x59d> > 63ce: 49 63 f5 movslq %r13d,%rsi > 63d1: 48 03 b5 98 fe ff ff add -0x168(%rbp),%rsi > 63d8: 48 8b bd a8 fe ff ff mov -0x158(%rbp),%rdi > 63df: e8 67 d9 ff ff callq 3d4b <obj_to_head> > 63e4: a8 01 test $0x1,%al > 63e6: 0f 84 d9 02 00 00 je 66c5 <zs_compact+0x57a> > 63ec: 48 83 e0 fe and $0xfffffffffffffffe,%rax > 63f0: bf 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%edi > 63f5: 48 89 85 b0 fe ff ff mov %rax,-0x150(%rbp) > 63fc: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 6401 <zs_compact+0x2b6> > 6401: 48 8b 85 b0 fe ff ff mov -0x150(%rbp),%rax RAX: 2065676162726166 so rax is totally garbage, I think. It means obj_to_head returns garbage because get_first_obj_offset is utter crab because (page_idx / class->pages_per_zspage) was totally wrong. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > 6408: f0 0f ba 28 00 lock btsl $0x0,(%rax) <snip> > > Could you test with [zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page] > > in mmotm? > > sure, I can. will it help, tho? we have a race condition here I think. I guess root cause is caused by get_first_obj_offset. Please test with it. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
