RE: [PATCH RFC kernel] balloon: speed up inflating/deflating process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > >  {
> > > > -	struct scatterlist sg;
> > > >  	unsigned int len;
> > > >
> > > > -	sg_init_one(&sg, vb->pfns, sizeof(vb->pfns[0]) * vb->num_pfns);
> > > > +	if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev,
> > > VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_PAGE_BITMAP)) {
> > > > +		u32 page_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > +		unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, flags = 0, bmap_len;
> > > > +		struct scatterlist sg[5];
> > > > +
> > > > +		start_pfn = rounddown(vb->start_pfn, BITS_PER_LONG);
> > > > +		end_pfn = roundup(vb->end_pfn, BITS_PER_LONG);
> > > > +		bmap_len = (end_pfn - start_pfn) / BITS_PER_LONG *
> > > sizeof(long);
> > > > +
> > > > +		sg_init_table(sg, 5);
> > > > +		sg_set_buf(&sg[0], &flags, sizeof(flags));
> > > > +		sg_set_buf(&sg[1], &start_pfn, sizeof(start_pfn));
> > > > +		sg_set_buf(&sg[2], &page_shift, sizeof(page_shift));
> > > > +		sg_set_buf(&sg[3], &bmap_len, sizeof(bmap_len));
> > > > +		sg_set_buf(&sg[4], vb->page_bitmap +
> > > > +				 (start_pfn / BITS_PER_LONG), bmap_len);
> > >
> > > This can be pre-initialized, correct?
> >
> > pre-initialized? I am not quite understand your mean.
> 
> I think you can maintain sg as part of device state and init sg with the bitmap.
> 

I got it.

> > > This is grossly inefficient if you only requested a single page.
> > > And it's also allocating memory very aggressively without ever
> > > telling the host what is going on.
> >
> > If only requested a single page, there is no need  to send the entire
> > page bitmap, This RFC patch has already considered about this.
> 
> where's that addressed in code?
> 

By record the start_pfn and end_pfn.

The start_pfn & end_pfn will be updated in set_page_bitmap()
and will be used in the function tell_host():

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+static void set_page_bitmap(struct virtio_balloon *vb, struct page 
+*page) {
+	unsigned int i;
+	unsigned long *bitmap = vb->page_bitmap;
+	unsigned long balloon_pfn = page_to_balloon_pfn(page);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE; i++)
+		set_bit(balloon_pfn + i, bitmap);
+	if (balloon_pfn < vb->start_pfn)
+		vb->start_pfn = balloon_pfn;
+	if (balloon_pfn > vb->end_pfn)
+		vb->end_pfn = balloon_pfn;
+}


+		unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, flags = 0, bmap_len;
+		struct scatterlist sg[5];
+
+		start_pfn = rounddown(vb->start_pfn, BITS_PER_LONG);
+		end_pfn = roundup(vb->end_pfn, BITS_PER_LONG);
+		bmap_len = (end_pfn - start_pfn) / BITS_PER_LONG * sizeof(long);
+
+		sg_init_table(sg, 5);
+		sg_set_buf(&sg[0], &flags, sizeof(flags));
+		sg_set_buf(&sg[1], &start_pfn, sizeof(start_pfn));
+		sg_set_buf(&sg[2], &page_shift, sizeof(page_shift));
+		sg_set_buf(&sg[3], &bmap_len, sizeof(bmap_len));
+		sg_set_buf(&sg[4], vb->page_bitmap +
+				 (start_pfn / BITS_PER_LONG), bmap_len);
+		virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq, sg, 5, vb, GFP_KERNEL);
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > But it can works very well if requesting several pages  which across a
> > large range.
> 
> Some kind of limit on range would make sense though.
> It need not cover max pfn.
> 

Yes, agree.

> > > Suggestion to address all above comments:
> > > 	1. allocate a bunch of pages and link them up,
> > > 	   calculating the min and the max pfn.
> > > 	   if max-min exceeds the allocated bitmap size,
> > > 	   tell host.
> >
> > I am not sure if it works well in some cases, e.g. The allocated pages
> > are across a wide range and the max-min > limit is very frequently to be
> true.
> > Then, there will be many times of virtio transmission and it's bad for
> > performance improvement. Right?
> 
> It's a tradeoff for sure. Measure it, see what the overhead is.

OK, I will try and get back to you.

> 
> >
> > > 	2. limit allocated bitmap size to something reasonable.
> > > 	   How about 32Kbytes? This is 256kilo bit in the map, which comes
> > > 	   out to 1Giga bytes of memory in the balloon.
> >
> > So, even the VM has 1TB of RAM, the page bitmap will take 32MB of
> memory.
> > Maybe it's better to use a big page bitmap the save the pages
> > allocated by balloon, and split the big page bitmap to 32K bytes unit, then
> transfer one unit at a time.
> 
> How is this different from what I said?
> 

It's good if it's the same as you said.

Thanks!
Liang

> >
> > Should we use a page bitmap to replace 'vb->pages' ?
> >
> > How about rolling back to use PFNs if the count of requested pages is a
> small number?
> >
> > Liang
> 
> That's why we have start pfn. you can use that to pass even a single page
> without a lot of overhead.
> 
> > > > --
> > > > 1.9.1
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo
> > > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux