Re: [PATCH resend] powerpc: enable qspinlock and its virtualization support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016年04月29日 05:07, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 04/28/2016 06:55 AM, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>> From: Pan Xinhui<xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch aims to enable qspinlock on PPC. And on pseries platform, it also support
>> paravirt qspinlock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui<xinhui.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h               | 37 +++++++++++++++
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h      | 36 +++++++++++++++
>>   .../powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt_types.h | 13 ++++++
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h                | 31 ++++++++-----
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h          |  4 ++
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/paravirt.c                     | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/powerpc/lib/locks.c                           | 32 +++++++++++++
>>   arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c             |  5 +++
>>   8 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock.h
>>   create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt.h
>>   create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/qspinlock_paravirt_types.h
>>   create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/paravirt.c
>>
>>
> 
> This is just an enablement patch. You will also need a patch to activate qspinlock for, at lease, some PPC configs. Right?
> 
yep, I want to enable these config and makefile at last.
it just looks like

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
index 2da380f..ae7c2f1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_970_NAP)	+= idle_power4.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_P7_NAP)	+= idle_power7.o
 procfs-y			:= proc_powerpc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS)		+= $(procfs-y)
+obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS)	+= paravirt.o
 rtaspci-$(CONFIG_PPC64)-$(CONFIG_PCI)	:= rtas_pci.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_RTAS)		+= rtas.o rtas-rtc.o $(rtaspci-y-y)
 obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_RTAS_DAEMON)	+= rtasd.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
index bec90fb..46632e4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ config PPC_PSERIES
 	select HOTPLUG_CPU if SMP
 	select ARCH_RANDOM
 	select PPC_DOORBELL
+	select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
 	default y
 
 config PPC_SPLPAR
@@ -127,3 +128,11 @@ config HV_PERF_CTRS
 	  systems. 24x7 is available on Power 8 systems.
 
           If unsure, select Y.
+
+config PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
+	bool "Paravirtialization support for qspinlock"
+	depends on PPC_SPLPAR && QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
+	default y
+	help
+	  If platform supports virtualization, for example PowerVM, this option
+	  can let guest have a better performace.
-- 
2.4.3

> It has dependency on the pv_wait() patch that I sent out extend the parameter list. Some performance data on how PPC system will perform with and without qspinlock will also be helpful data points.
> 
For now, pv_wait defined in ppc is static inline void pv_wait(u8 *ptr, u8 val)
My plan is that waiting your patch goes in kernel tree first, then I send out another patch to extend the parameter list.

yes, I need copy some performance data in my patch's comments.

thanks
xinhui
> Cheers,
> Longman
> 

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux