On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> > > presence of a comment.
> []
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > > @@ -5133,7 +5133,8 @@ sub process {
> > > }x;
> > > my $all_barriers = qr{
> > > $barriers|
> > > - smp_(?:$smp_barrier_stems)
> > > + smp_(?:$smp_barrier_stems)|
> > > + virt_(?:$smp_barrier_stems)
> >
> > Sorry I'm late to the party here, but would it make sense to write this as:
> >
> > (?:smp|virt)_(?:$smp_barrier_stems)
>
> Yes. Perhaps the name might be better as barrier_stems.
>
> Also, ideally this would be longest match first or use \b
> after the matches so that $all_barriers could work
> successfully without a following \s*\(
>
> my $all_barriers = qr{
> (?:smp|virt)_(?:barrier_stems)|
> $barriers)
> }x;
>
> or maybe add separate $smp_barriers and $virt_barriers
>
> <shrug> it doesn't matter much in any case
OK just to clarify - are you OK with merging the patch as is?
Refactorings can come as patches on top if required.
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
