On 01/12/2015 00:20, Ming Lin wrote: > qemu-nvme: 148MB/s > vhost-nvme + google-ext: 230MB/s > qemu-nvme + google-ext + eventfd: 294MB/s > virtio-scsi: 296MB/s > virtio-blk: 344MB/s > > "vhost-nvme + google-ext" didn't get good enough performance. I'd expect it to be on par of qemu-nvme with ioeventfd but the question is: why should it be better? For vhost-net, the answer is that more zerocopy can be done if you put the data path in the kernel. But qemu-nvme is already using io_submit for the data path, perhaps there's not much to gain from vhost-nvme... Paolo > Still tuning. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
