On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:38:06AM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > Hi Suman, > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> wrote: > > The remoteproc core uses a static ida named rproc_dev_index for > > assigning an automatic index number to a registered remoteproc. > > The ida core may allocate some internal idr cache layers and ida > > bitmap upon any ida allocation, and all these layers are truely > > freed only upon the ida destruction. The rproc_dev_index ida is > > not destroyed at present, leading to a memory leak when using the > > remoteproc core as a module and atleast one rproc device is > > registered and unregistered. > > > > Fix this by invoking ida_destroy() in the remoteproc core module > > exit. > > I saw there was some discussion about this between Michael, James and > Tejun whether this should be fixed in the IDA core or not. > > Has it been resolved? > > Thanks, > Ohad. I don't think we reached any conclusions. I guess I'll merge the virtio patch as-is then. Ohad, would you like to merge 2/2? -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
