On Do, 2015-09-10 at 09:59 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 9 September 2015 at 12:42, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> > index 1245d09..e00298e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static const struct file_operations virtio_gpu_driver_fops = {
> >
> >
> > static struct drm_driver driver = {
> > - .driver_features = DRIVER_MODESET | DRIVER_GEM | DRIVER_PRIME,
> > + .driver_features = DRIVER_MODESET | DRIVER_GEM | DRIVER_PRIME | DRIVER_RENDER,
>
> I believe that this will only create the renderD# node. Shouldn't one
> also tag the relevant ioctls with DRM_RENDER_ALLOW ?
Dave? Looking at the ioctls they are all fine for render nodes, there
isn't anything modesetting related in the device-specific ioctls.
Correct?
cheers,
Gerd
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
