On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:46:49PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:10:01PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >>> >> 1) if there is a guarantee now and in the future (even if only >>> >> restricted to netdevs) that no virtio bus will have a direct sibling >>> >> bus (i.e., with the same parent device); or >>> > >>> > I think this is the case. The virtio bus is an artifact. >>> > There's always a single one behind each pci device. >>> > Is this sufficient? >>> >>> I *think* is not good enough for udev to offer such functionality. >>> >>> We need an authoritative answer that this cannot happen with today's >>> code, and also that there are no plans to ever make multiple virtio >>> devices per parent device. > >> But if virtio will make such a promise, will that be sufficient? > > Sure. Any chance we could get such a guarantee? Anything else needed from our side? I have a pending patch that would be nice to get out, which would depend on such a guarantee. Cheers, Tom _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
