On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 07:17:44AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:32:10PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias > > <edgar.iglesias@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:51:48PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > > "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > First off, I have handed maintainership off to Michael S. Tsirkin, so > > > > his word is now law. > > > > > > > > That said... there's nothing fundamentally *wrong* with this, but it's > > > > not how standard virtio works. We decided some time ago that as we're > > > > paravirtualized, we would not be doing address mapping. > > > > > > > > rpmsg uses virtio, but it's with a twist: they're not talking to a > > > > host. Thus my preference, in order, would be: > > > > > > > > 1) Don't use non-kmalloc addresses. > > > > 2) If that's not possible, call these _dma interfaces _rpmsg instead, > > > > so normal virtio users don't get confused and try to use them. > > > > > > Thanks Rusty, > > > > > > That was helpful, I'll see if I can do something in line with nr 2. > > > > > > AFAICT, #1 will be hard. The remote-processor would have to be > > > cache-coherent and share memory address-space view with the master > > > CPU. This is not the common case for remoteproc (unlike when virtio > > > communication flows between host and guest on the same CPU or SMP system). > > > Ohad, do you have any thoughts on this? > > > > rpmsg is allocating a large chunk (256KB) of physically-contiguous CMA > > memory today, which is exposed via the dma_alloc_coherent API (and set > > up in advance by platform-specific code), so if #2 above is > > acceptable, it would be easier, yeah. > > > > Thanks, > > Ohad. > > I'm thinking same as Rusty: I'd prefer 1 but if not possible, I can live > with 2 above. Thanks all for the feedback, I'm currently travelling and won't be doing much coding until august/september. We are using something along the lines of nr 2 at Xilinx and it's working fine. I'll post something like that in september if no one beats me to it. Best regards, Edgar _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
