Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] vhost: feature to set the vring endianness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:25:03 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[ ... ]
> > > > @@ -630,6 +634,53 @@ static long vhost_set_memory(struct vhost_dev *d, struct vhost_memory __user *m)
> > > >  	return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_VHOST_SET_ENDIAN_LEGACY
> > > > +static long vhost_set_vring_big_endian(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> > > > +				       int __user *argp)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct vhost_vring_state s;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (vq->private_data)
> > > > +		return -EBUSY;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (copy_from_user(&s, argp, sizeof(s)))
> > > > +		return -EFAULT;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (s.num && s.num != 1)
> > > 
> > > s.num & ~0x1
> > > 
> > 
> > Since s.num is unsigned and I assume this won't change, what about
> > s.num > 1 as suggested by Cornelia ?
> 
> I just tried and gcc optimizes
> s.num != 0 && s.num != 1 to s.num > 1
> 
> The former will be more readable once we
> replace 0 and 1 with defines.
> 
> So ignore my advice, keep code as is but use defines.
> 

Ok.

[ ... ] 
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
> > > > @@ -103,6 +103,15 @@ struct vhost_memory {
> > > >  /* Get accessor: reads index, writes value in num */
> > > >  #define VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE _IOWR(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x12, struct vhost_vring_state)
> > > >  
> > > > +/* Set the vring byte order in num. This is a legacy only API that is simply
> > > > + * ignored when VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 is set.
> > > > + * 0 to set to little-endian
> > > > + * 1 to set to big-endian
> > > 
> > > How about defines for these?
> > > 
> > 
> > Ok. I'll put the defines here so that all the cross-endian stuff
> > lies in the same hunk. Is it ok for you ?
> 
> Fine.
> 
> > > > + * other values return EINVAL.
> 
> Pls also add a note saying that not all kernel configurations support this ioctl,
> but all configurations that support SET also support GET.
> 

Ok.

> > > > + */
> > > > +#define VHOST_SET_VRING_BIG_ENDIAN _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x13, struct vhost_vring_state)
> > > > +#define VHOST_GET_VRING_BIG_ENDIAN _IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x14, struct vhost_vring_state)
> > > > +
> > > >  /* The following ioctls use eventfd file descriptors to signal and poll
> > > >   * for events. */
> > > >  
> > > 
> 
> I'm inclined to think VHOST_SET_VRING_ENDIAN is a slightly better name.
> What do you think?
> 

Or VHOST_SET_VRING_CROSS_ENDIAN ? I like the idea to keep a hint that this
API is for cross-endian only... like the rest of this series.

--
Greg

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux