Hi,
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> > index e894eb2..a3167fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
> > @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static int virtio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev,
> > goto err_enable_device;
> >
> > rc = pci_request_regions(pci_dev, "virtio-pci");
> > - if (rc)
> > + if (rc && ((pci_dev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA))
> > goto err_request_regions;
> >
> > if (force_legacy) {
>
> This is probably what you described as "the only concern?
Ahem, no, forgot that one, but it is related. With vesafb using and
registering the vga compat framebuffer bar pci_request_regions will not
succeed.
vesafb will be unregistered later on (this is what I was refering to) by
the virtio-gpu driver.
> If we only need to request specific
> regions, I think we should do exactly that, requesting only parts of
> regions that are covered by the virtio capabilities.
That should work too.
cheers,
Gerd
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
