Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add virtio-input driver.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 01:29:49PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
[...]
>> > +static int virtinput_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct virtio_input *vi;
>> > +       size_t size;
>> > +       int abs, err;
>> > +
>> > +       vi = kzalloc(sizeof(*vi), GFP_KERNEL);
>> > +       if (!vi) {
>> > +               err = -ENOMEM;
>> > +               goto out1;
>> > +       }
>> > +       vdev->priv = vi;
>> > +       vi->vdev = vdev;
>> > +
>> > +       err = virtinput_init_vqs(vi);
>> > +       if (err)
>> > +               goto out2;
>> > +
>> > +       vi->idev = input_allocate_device();
>> > +       if (!vi->idev) {
>> > +               err = -ENOMEM;
>> > +               goto out3;
>> > +       }
>> > +       input_set_drvdata(vi->idev, vi);
>> > +
>> > +       size = virtinput_cfg_select(vi, VIRTIO_INPUT_CFG_ID_NAME, 0);
>> > +       virtio_cread_bytes(vi->vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_input_config, u),
>> > +                          vi->name, min(size, sizeof(vi->name)));
>> > +       size = virtinput_cfg_select(vi, VIRTIO_INPUT_CFG_ID_SERIAL, 0);
>> > +       virtio_cread_bytes(vi->vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_input_config, u),
>> > +                          vi->serial, min(size, sizeof(vi->serial)));
>> > +       snprintf(vi->phys, sizeof(vi->phys),
>> > +                "virtio%d/input0", vdev->index);
>> > +
>> > +       virtinput_cfg_bits(vi, VIRTIO_INPUT_CFG_PROP_BITS, 0,
>> > +                          vi->idev->propbit, INPUT_PROP_CNT);
>> > +       size = virtinput_cfg_select(vi, VIRTIO_INPUT_CFG_EV_BITS, EV_REP);
>> > +       if (size)
>> > +               set_bit(EV_REP, vi->idev->evbit);
>> > +
>> > +       vi->idev->name = vi->name;
>> > +       vi->idev->phys = vi->phys;
>>
>> Can you set vi->idev->uniq to the virtio-bus path?
>
> No, uniq can't be phys as phys is unique within the system while uniq is
> like serial number or UUID and should never repeat.

...sorry, my bad! We should still forward it from the host, imo. It's
really handy for applications to re-detect devices.

Thanks
David
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux