On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:43:43 +1100 David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:25:07PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > With virtio-1, we support more than 32 feature bits. Let's extend both > > host and guest features to 64, which should suffice for a while. > > > > vhost and migration have been ignored for now. > > [snip] > > > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > index f6c0379..08141c7 100644 > > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h > > @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ > > /* A guest should never accept this. It implies negotiation is broken. */ > > #define VIRTIO_F_BAD_FEATURE 30 > > > > +/* v1.0 compliant. */ > > +#define VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 32 > > This is already in the kernel header, isn't it? > Yes. But nearly all files include this header but not the kernel header. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization