On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:18:18PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > QEMU side is still undergoing polishing, but is already testable. > > Looked art the qemu side for now, commenting here due to qemu patches > not being posted to the list yet (guess that is at least partly already > on your todo list): Absolutely. > * Both legacy and modern should be switchable. Modern needs to be > switchable _anyway_ for backward compatibility with old qemu > versions. But legacy should be too, for testing purposes and for > new device types which don't need legacy in the first place. I agree. > * I'd like to see some more flexibility in the pci bar layout. Stuff > I have in mind: > - New devices which don't need a legacy bar can use bar 0 for > modern. > - One MMIO bar is enough, we can place both virtio regions and > msi-x regions there. I'd suggest to add msi-x sub-regions to > the modern bar. Why exactly? It seems simpler to separate things, extra BARs have no cost. > * What is the reason for making the modern bar 8M in size? Looks a bit > excessive, given that only 64k or so of that are actually used ... I use a page per VQ for architectures that can locate the offset of the accessed page that triggered EPT violation faster than the offset within page. I think this is the case for SVM. > > virtio-scsi seems to be broken, at least my usual fedora guest didn't > boot up from virtio-scsi disk when using a guest kernel with this patch > series applied. > > cheers, > Gerd I'll re-test. Do other devices work for you? Thanks! _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
