On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 10:53:42AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Hi all: > > This series try to share MSIX irq for each tx/rx queue pair. This is > done through: > > - introducing virtio pci channel which are group of virtqueues that > sharing a single MSIX irq (Patch 1) > - expose channel setting to virtio core api (Patch 2) > - try to use channel setting in virtio-net (Patch 3) > > For the transport that does not support channel, channel paramters > were simply ignored. For devices that does not use channel, it can > simply pass NULL or zero to virito core. > > With the patch, 1 MSIX irq were saved for each TX/RX queue pair. > > Please review. How does this sharing affect performance? > Thanks > > Jason Wang (3): > virtio-pci: introduce channels > virtio: let vp_find_vqs accept channel setting paramters > virtio-net: using single MSIX irq for each TX/RX queue pair > > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 +- > drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 3 +- > drivers/lguest/lguest_device.c | 5 +- > drivers/misc/mic/card/mic_virtio.c | 5 +- > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c | 3 +- > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 26 ++++- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 5 +- > drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 3 +- > drivers/s390/kvm/kvm_virtio.c | 5 +- > drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c | 5 +- > drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 3 +- > drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 3 +- > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 5 +- > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 207 ++++++++++++++++++++------------- > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h | 19 ++- > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 8 +- > 16 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.8.3.1 _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
