On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:46:46 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 02:00:22PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > virtio-ccw should now have everything in place to operate virtio 1.0
> > devices, so let's enable revision 1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks like this will allow revision 1 for all devices,
> we only want this for virtio 1 devices.
>
> The following should fix it I think:
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> @@ -104,6 +101,12 @@ struct VirtioCcwDevice {
> uint64_t ind_bit;
> };
>
> +/* The maximum virtio revision we support. */
> +static int virtio_ccw_rev_max(VirtioCcwDevice *dev)
Make this "static inline int" and I'm fine with this :)
> +{
> + return dev->host_features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
> /* virtual css bus type */
> typedef struct VirtualCssBus {
> BusState parent_obj;
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
