On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 17:12:08 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:21:03PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:48:39 +0200 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 01:37:40PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 17:12:13 +0200 > > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > len is always initialized since function is called with size > 0. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/vhost/net.c | 2 +- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c > > > > > index 984242e..54ffbb0 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c > > > > > @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static int get_rx_bufs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, > > > > > int headcount = 0; > > > > > unsigned d; > > > > > int r, nlogs = 0; > > > > > - u32 len; > > > > > + u32 uninitialized_var(len); > > > > > > > > > > while (datalen > 0 && headcount < quota) { > > > > > if (unlikely(seg >= UIO_MAXIOV)) { > > > > > > > > Want to merge this with the patch introducing the variable and add a > > > > comment there? > > > > > > Not really. Warnings in bisect are fine I think. > > > > I'm not sure what a separate patch buys us, though, as it should be > > trivial to merge. > > Easier to document the reason if it's split out. > That's why I suggested a comment ;) _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization