Re: [PATCH v7 16/46] virtio_blk: v1.0 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Based on patch by Cornelia Huck.
> 
> Note: for consistency, and to avoid sparse errors,
>       convert all fields, even those no longer in use
>       for virtio v1.0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
...
> 
> -static unsigned int features[] = {
> +static unsigned int features_legacy[] = {
>  	VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY,
>  	VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI,
>  	VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE,
>  	VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
> +}
> +;
> +static unsigned int features[] = {
> +	VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY,
> +	VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE,
> +	VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY,
> +	VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
> +	VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1,

We can fit this into less lines, like done for features_legacy.

I was asking myself if we could do the conversion of the statical values
somehow upfront, to reduce the patch size and avoid cpu_to_virtio.* at those
places.

Otherwise looks good to me.


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux