On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:58:20PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:22:07PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:38:16PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 09:44:23AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 08:56:04PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 06:18:18PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am playing with vhost multiqueue capability and have a question about > > > > > > vhost multiqueue and RSS (receive side steering). My setup has Mellanox > > > > > > ConnectX-3 NIC which supports multiqueue and RSS. Network related > > > > > > parameters for qemu are: > > > > > > > > > > > > -netdev tap,id=hn0,script=qemu-ifup.sh,vhost=on,queues=4 > > > > > > -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hn0,id=nic1,mq=on,vectors=10 > > > > > > > > > > > > In a guest I ran "ethtool -L eth0 combined 4" to enable multiqueue. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am running one tcp stream into the guest using iperf. Since there is > > > > > > only one tcp stream I expect it to be handled by one queue only but > > > > > > this seams to be not the case. ethtool -S on a host shows that the > > > > > > stream is handled by one queue in the NIC, just like I would expect, > > > > > > but in a guest all 4 virtio-input interrupt are incremented. Am I > > > > > > missing any configuration? > > > > > > > > > > I don't see anything obviously wrong with what you describe. > > > > > Maybe, somehow, same irqfd got bound to multiple MSI vectors? > > > > It does not look like this is what is happening judging by the way > > > > interrupts are distributed between queues. They are not distributed > > > > uniformly and often I see one queue gets most interrupt and others get > > > > much less and then it changes. > > > > > > Weird. It would happen if you transmitted from multiple CPUs. > > > You did pin iperf to a single CPU within guest, did you not? > > > > > No, I didn't because I didn't expect it to matter for input interrupts. > > When I run iperf on a host rx queue that receives all packets depends > > only on a connection itself, not on a cpu iperf is running on (I tested > > that). > > This really depends on the type of networking card you have > on the host, and how it's configured. > > I think you will get something more closely resembling this > behaviour if you enable RFS in host. > > > When I pin iperf in a guest I do indeed see that all interrupts > > are arriving to the same irq vector. Is a number after virtio-input > > in /proc/interrupt any indication of a queue a packet arrived to (on > > a host I can use ethtool -S to check what queue receives packets, but > > unfortunately this does not work for virtio nic in a guest)? > > I think it is. > > > Because if > > it is the way RSS works in virtio is not how it works on a host and not > > what I would expect after reading about RSS. The queue a packets arrives > > to should be calculated by hashing fields from a packet header only. > > Yes, what virtio has is not RSS - it's an accelerated RFS really. > OK, if what virtio has is RFS and not RSS my test results make sense. Thanks! -- Gleb. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
