On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:04:28AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:24:22 -0700 > Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 10/07/2014 07:39 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > This patchset aims to get us some way to implement virtio-1 compliant > > > and transitional devices in qemu. Branch available at > > > > > > git://github.com/cohuck/qemu virtio-1 > > > > > > I've mainly focused on: > > > - endianness handling > > > - extended feature bits > > > - virtio-ccw new/changed commands > > > > At the risk of some distraction, would it be worth thinking about a > > solution to the IOMMU bypassing mess as part of this? > > I think that is a whole different issue. virtio-1 is basically done - we > just need to implement it - while the IOMMU/DMA stuff certainly needs > more discussion. Therefore, I'd like to defer to the other discussion > thread here. I agree, let's do a separate thread for this. I also think it's up to the hypervisors at this point. People talked about using ACPI to report IOMMU bypass to guest. If that happens, we don't need a feature bit. > _______________________________________________ > Virtualization mailing list > Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
