From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:23:28 +0300 > You used __netif_subqueue_stopped but that seems to use > a slightly more expensive test_bit internally. More expensive in what sense? It should be roughly the same as "x & y" sans the volatile. Anyways I'm ambivalent and I want to see this bug fixes, so I'll apply your patch. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
