On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 13:55 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > If the eventual solution is to say that virtio 1.0 PCI devices always > respect an IOMMU unless they set a magic flag saying "I'm not real > hardware and I bypass the IOMMU", then I don't really object to that, > except that it'll be a mess if the guest is running Xen. But even Xen > would (I think) be okay if it actually worked by having a new DMA API > operation that says "this device is magically identity mapped" and > then just teaching Xen to implement that. > > But I'm not an OASIS member, so I can't really do this. I agree that > this issue needs to be addressed somehow, but I don't think it needs > to block these patches. I'll let Rusty be the final judge of that (well, when he's back from his vacation that is). Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
