On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:30:23AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 09/20/2014 06:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 19/09/2014 09:10, Jason Wang ha scritto:
> >>>>
> >>>> - if (!vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX)) {
> >>>> + if (vq->urgent || !vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX)) {
> >> So the urgent descriptor only work when event index was not enabled?
> >> This seems suboptimal, we may still want to benefit from event index
> >> even if urgent descriptor is used. Looks like we need return true here
> >> when vq->urgent is true?
> > Its ||, not &&.
> >
> > Without event index, all descriptors are treated as urgent.
> >
> > Paolo
> >
>
> The problem is if vq->urgent is true, the patch checks
> VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT bit. This bit were set unconditionally in
> virtqueue_enable_cb() regardless of event index feature and cleared
> unconditionally in virtqueue_disable_cb().
The reverse actually, right?
> So virtqueue_enable_cb() was
> used to not only publish a new event index but also enable the urgent
> descriptor. And virtqueue_disable_cb() disabled all interrupts including
> the urgent descriptor. Guest won't get urgent interrupts by just adding
> virtqueue_add_outbuf_urgent() since what it needs is to enable and
> disable interrupt for !urgent descriptor.
Right, we want a new API that advances event index but does not
set VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT.
IMO still want to set VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT when handling tx
interrupts, to avoid interrupt storms.
> Btw, not sure "urgent" is a suitable name, since interrupt is often slow
> in kvm guest. And in fact virtio-net will probably use "urgent"
> descriptor for those packets (e.g stream packets who can be delayed a
> little bit to batch more bytes from userspace) who was not urgent
> compared to other packets.
>
Yes but we are asking for an interrupt before event index is reached
because something is waiting for the packet to be transmitted.
I couldn't come up with a better name.
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
