> > Actually, that MSR address range has been reserved for that purpose, along > > with: > > - CPUID.EAX=1 -> ECX bit 31 (always returns 0 on bare metal) > > - CPUID.EAX=4000_00xxH leaves (i.e. HYPERVISOR CPUID) > > I don't know whether this is documented anywhere, but Linux tries to > detect a hypervisor by searching CPUID leaves 0x400xyz00 for > "KVMKVMKVM\0\0\0", so at least Linux can handle the KVM leaves being > in a somewhat variable location. > > Do we consider this mechanism to work across all hypervisors and > guests? That is, could we put something like "CrossHVPara\0" > somewhere in that range, where each hypervisor would be free to decide > exactly where it ends up? That's also possible, but extending the hypervisor CPUID range beywond 400000FFH is not officially sanctioned by Intel. Xen started doing that in order to expose both Hyper-V and Xen CPUID leaves, and KVM followed the practice. Paolo _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
