Re: [PATCH] virtio_blk: merge S/G list entries by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Most virtio setups have a fairly limited number of ring entries available.
> Enable S/G entry merging by default to fit into less of them.  This restores
> the behavior at time of the virtio-blk blk-mq conversion, which was changed
> by commit "block: add queue flag for disabling SG merging" which made the
> behavior optional, but didn't update the existing drivers to keep their
> previous behavior.

It is a good idea to disable SG merge for vq incapable of indirect because
there are very limited direct descriptors.

For vq capable of indirect, it should be better to not do SG merge at default
because:

- from hypervisor view, no matter how many segments one req has, all are
submitted to host kernel by one syscall, such as readv/io_submit

- host kernel still need to do the same merge again

>From my test(virtio-blk over null_blk), looks enabling SG merge may cause
throughput a little drop(~3%).

>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> index 0a58140..311b857 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>         vblk->tag_set.ops = &virtio_mq_ops;
>         vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth;
>         vblk->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> -       vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
> +       vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE | BLK_MQ_F_SG_MERGE;
>         vblk->tag_set.cmd_size =
>                 sizeof(struct virtblk_req) +
>                 sizeof(struct scatterlist) * sg_elems;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Thanks,
-- 
Ming Lei
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux