On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:36:54PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the > scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, > and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, > we're ready to service that request. > > This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to > check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the > host. The revert follows in the next commit. > > There's a slight behaviour change here on unsuccessful hwrng_register(). > Previously, when hwrng_register() failed, the probe() routine would > fail, and the vqs would be torn down, and driver would be marked not > initialized. Now, the vqs will remain initialized, driver would be > marked initialized as well, but won't be available in the list of RNGs > available to hwrng core. To fix the failures, the procedure remains the > same, i.e. unload and re-load the module, and hope things succeed the > next time around. > > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > (cherry picked from commit 5c06273401f2eb7b290cadbae18ee00f8f65e893) > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Conflicts: > drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c > > Context conflict due to not backporting two commits that changed > struct layout. What is this "Conflicts:" stuff for? I don't need that... greg k-h _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
