On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 06:56:35PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> On (Wed) 02 Jul 2014 [13:00:19], Jason Cooper wrote:
>> > Commit d9e7972619334 "hwrng: add randomness to system from rng sources"
>> > added a call to rng_get_data() from the hwrng_register() function.
>> > However, some rng devices need initialization before data can be read
>> > from them.
>> >
>> > Also, the virtio-rng device does not behave properly when this call is
>> > made in its probe() routine - the virtio core sets the DRIVER_OK status
>> > bit only on a successful probe, which means the host ignores all
>> > communication from the guest, and the guest insmod or boot process just
>> > sits there doing nothing.
>> >
>> > [ jac: Modify the API to allow drivers to disable reading at probe, new
>> > patch, copied Amit's commit message. ]
>> >
>> > CC: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CC: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v3.15+
>> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 8 +++++---
>> > include/linux/hw_random.h | 4 ++++
>> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
>> > index 334601cc81cf..b7b6c48ca682 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
>> > @@ -347,9 +347,11 @@ int hwrng_register(struct hwrng *rng)
>> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rng->list);
>> > list_add_tail(&rng->list, &rng_list);
>> >
>> > - bytes_read = rng_get_data(rng, bytes, sizeof(bytes), 1);
>> > - if (bytes_read > 0)
>> > - add_device_randomness(bytes, bytes_read);
>> > + if (!(rng->flags & HWRNG_NO_READ_AT_PROBE)) {
>> > + bytes_read = rng_get_data(rng, bytes, sizeof(bytes), 1);
>> > + if (bytes_read > 0)
>> > + add_device_randomness(bytes, bytes_read);
>> > + }
>>
>> But this has the inverse problem: if there are two hwrngs in the
>> system, one will be initialized and probed. The other will not be
>> initialized, but still be probed.
>
> That's a problem outside the scope of this patch. You're basically
> saying the ->init() should be called unconditionally for each hwrng. If
> that's what driver authors assumed, that's not what is happening if
> there is more than one driver in the system.
My intent with the patch was to get randomness added when a hwrng was
available. Perhaps instead of skipping this call, it can be done
either during probe (for devices that support it or lack an init
function), or done after initialization?
> I think you should be changing the code a few lines up to make sure
> hwrng_init() is called once for each driver.
Is that really how it should work? I'd be for the "always-init"
approach since it gains us access to the entropy, but I have to play
devil's advocate: would one expect "probe" to just probe, not
initialize? That seems more like a function of enabling the device.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
