On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:05:56PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 2014-06-25 20:08, Ming Lei wrote: > >Hi, > > > >These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one > >virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's > >hardware queue. > > > >With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk > >device can get improved. > > > >For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over > >qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification > >from each vq and processing host I/O are still kept in the per-device > >iothread context, the change is based on qemu v2.0.0 release, and > >can be accessed from below tree: > > > > git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ming/qemu.git #v2.0.0-virtblk-mq.1 > > > >For enabling the multi-vq feature, 'num_queues=N' need to be added into > >'-device virtio-blk-pci ...' of qemu command line, and suggest to pass > >'vectors=N+1' to keep one MSI irq vector per each vq, and the feature > >depends on x-data-plane. > > > >Fio(libaio, randread, iodepth=64, bs=4K, jobs=N) is run inside VM to > >verify the improvement. > > > >I just create a small quadcore VM and run fio inside the VM, and > >num_queues of the virtio-blk device is set as 2, but looks the > >improvement is still obvious. > > > >1), about scalability > >- without mutli-vq feature > > -- jobs=2, thoughput: 145K iops > > -- jobs=4, thoughput: 100K iops > >- with mutli-vq feature > > -- jobs=2, thoughput: 193K iops > > -- jobs=4, thoughput: 202K iops > > > >2), about thoughput > >- without mutli-vq feature > > -- thoughput: 145K iops > >- with mutli-vq feature > > -- thoughput: 202K iops > > Of these numbers, I think it's important to highlight that the 2 thread case > is 33% faster and the 2 -> 4 thread case scales linearly (100%) while the > pre-patch case sees negative scaling going from 2 -> 4 threads (-39%). > > I haven't run your patches yet, but from looking at the code, it looks good. > It's pretty straightforward. See feel free to add my reviewed-by. > > Rusty, do you want to ack this (and I'll slurp it up for 3.17) Looks like I found some issues, so not yet pls. > or take this > yourself? Or something else? > > > -- > Jens Axboe _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
