On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:15:27 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:29:58PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote: > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > Please dont' do this, extra indirection hurts performance. > > > Instead, please change vhost_net_open and scsi to allocate the whole > > > structure with vmalloc if kmalloc fails, along the lines of > > > 74d332c13b2148ae934ea94dac1745ae92efe8e5 > > > > Back in January 2013, you didn't seem to think it was a good idea: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/23/492 > > Hmm true, and Dave thought the structure's too large. > I'll have to do some benchmarks to see what the effect > of Michael's patch is, performance-wise. > If it's too expensive I can pick up your patch, no need to > repost. > Hi Michael, do you have any update in this case for us? Michael _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
