Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > If Rusty agrees, I'd like to add it for 3.16 with a stable marker. Really stable? It improves performance, which is nice. But every patch which goes into the kernel fixes a bug, improves clarity, improves performance or adds a feature. I've now seen all four cases get CC'd into stable. Including some of mine explicitly not marked stable which get swept up by enthusiastic stable maintainers :( Is now there *any* patch short of a major rewrite which shouldn't get cc: stable? Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
